Centre opposes income-based quota within reserved categories, stating no creamy layer exists among SC/STs.

The Indian government has formally opposed petitions in the Supreme Court regarding the implementation of an income-based creamy layer within the reserved categories of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST). Government representatives argued that the existing provisions do not allow for the exclusion of wealthier individuals, or the so-called “creamy layer,” from benefits extended to these groups.

This stance is relevant in the ongoing discussions surrounding caste-based reservations, which have aimed to uplift historically marginalized communities through affirmative action. The Centre contends that the constitutionally mandated reservations are not solely based on economic status but reflect a broader commitment to social equity for SC/STs.

The issue arose from a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking to establish an income ceiling to separate more affluent individuals among SC/ST beneficiaries from those who are genuinely marginalized. The government has urged the Supreme Court to allow Parliament to make determinations regarding the creamy layer, emphasizing that any changes to reservation policies should be handled legislatively, rather than judicially.

Historically, the caste reservation system in India has been a contentious topic, with ongoing debates over its efficacy and fairness. As of now, SC/ST communities are allotted a specific percentage of government jobs and educational opportunities, aimed at rectifying socio-economic disadvantages faced by these groups.

As this legal challenge progresses, it will likely have significant implications for reservation policies and the interpretation of affirmative action in India.